(View at http://www.doctordsworld.blogspot.com/) Two reasons. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. Oh, and the failures of the Bush administration in the global energy market. Turkmenistan broke away from the Soviet Union in the 90s and both are sitting on large reserves of natural gas. If you look at the map you can see that they are nestled between the Caspian Sea and the Tien Shan of western China--completely land-locked with the Caspian Sea blocking a pipeline route to the west. Also on the map are India, China and Russia. These are huge, hungry energy markets; China and India more so than Russia, though they want the gas to sell to Europe. The energy in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan can go one of three ways: north to Moscow, east to China through Kazakhstan, or southwest to India. The route southwest to India goes through Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The US also wants this energy, not to power our plasma TVs, but to develop and sell to India--a bit of colonialism showing through our facade. And I don't mean to say that Americans would benefit at all from this, but the big oil corporations and their stakeholders would. The dubster basically blew that up with the first bomb dropped on Iraq to get Exxon-Mobil and Haliburton into the mix there, and finished it off with Darth Cheney's infatuation with bombing Iran, which could be related to his wanting to salvage some gas having lost out to Putin and China in other markets. Huge, permanent bases in Iraq would help us force our way into the market. Or it could just be that he is a dick.
Moscow has cozied up to Iran, and they have locked up a lot of the Asian gas market, but their state-run energy conglomerate, GAZPROM, has made Turkmenistan angry and it looks like China will get the bid to develop the fields there. Turkmenistan is lucky that China is such a huge player or Putin would probably roll out the tanks like he did in Georgia.
If the US were to stick to the MO of the Cold War, we would usher the Taliban back into power in Afghanistan, simply because they would rule with and iron fist and the pipeline plan would be safe--they have been known to respond to monetary incentives. Many on the right supported this in the past, the Tliban's support of al Qaeda not withstanding. We have frankly never really cared who runs a country as long as we get what we want (e.g., the Shah of Iran, Panama's Manuel Noriega, and Pinochet in Chile). Case in point is the fact that we completely ignored the brutal rule of Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan for the past decade.
So why are we in Afghanistan now? I'm not entirely sure. It could be because Jesus wants us to shoot insurgents and prop up an opium kingpin who rigs elections. It could be because military contractors and double-dipping generals are forcing Obama's hand. It could be that Obama really believes in the security angle and wants to prevent al Qaeda from rebuilding there. Or it could be that somehow they all still think that the pipeline to India will be built and our version of the East India Company will reap great profits. It's really hard to say.
Spreading freedom and giving every Afghani kid a puppy is a warm fuzzy for sure, but our soldiers are there because of the real prize: Asian natural gas.
